Brighton and Hove City Council is currently on track to overspend its budget by £7 million, down from a £10 million forecast made in July.
At a cabinet meeting on Thursday (17 October), members were told how the council was trying to rein in the forecast overspend by the end of the 2024-25 financial year next March.
The overspend relates to the council’s “general fund” which pays for essential council services.
But the council faces further financial pressure, with the “dedicated schools grant”, which comes from the government to fund “maintained schools”, falling short of budget predictions. The schools budget is currently expected to have a £1.4 million deficit.
Some 34 schools have “licensed deficits” totalling £7.1 million, compared with an expected overspend of £6.6 million, resulting in more pressure on the council’s general fund.
And services provided jointly with the NHS are at risk of an overspend of about £1.2 million.
The demand for adult social care continues to increase, with more people receiving support on being discharged from hospital. Councillors were told that £10 million was being spent on the increased costs linked to complex care.
The council is trying to make savings totalling £23.6 million but a fifth of the planned total – about £4.6 million – is also potentially “at risk”.
The budget for temporary housing is forecast to overspend by £2.4 million, attributed to a 12 per cent increase in nightly accommodation costs since last year.
The deputy leader of the council Jacob Taylor, who is also the cabinet member for finance, said that the council was moving in the right direction by increasing vacancy and spending controls to balance the budget.
The Labour councillor said: “Looking at the trajectory of previous years, we have every chance (of balancing the budget) if we remain focused.
“It is officers doing the work day to day on those financial management methods (so) that we should be able to come in on budget which is extremely important for this local authority.”
His cabinet colleague Emma Daniel offered hope for future savings, saying that the council was working to bring more children who need expensive specialist care and education back into Brighton and Hove.
One strand in the savings plan, she said, was to recommission Tudor House although this would not be achievable in the current financial year.
But at Drove Road, two young people were receiving full-time residential care in a placement that was helping the council to save £300,000 this year alone.
Councillor Daniel said: “What we had to do was go back to the drawing board. We listened to the families of those disabled children who are using Drove Road and Tudor House. We reconsidered what options are available.
“While our savings are going to be delayed until next year, they’re going to be bigger savings by doing that exercise and listening to people.”
What a surprise… It always felt like the administration were doing a doom and gloom forecast so it would be possible to try spin it into a slightly less doom and gloom one.
When any other party controls anything it’s always poor financial management on their part when there’s an overspend, yet when it’s Labour in control and there’s an overspend they cite a higher demand for statutory services. A bit of honesty rather than the blame game would be good – ANY overspend is directly connected to 14 years of Tory austerity, and it was wrong of Labour to suggest otherwise in the past. Councils need to be funded properly, and if the new government fails to do that, and this council fails to challenge them on it – they really will be doing residents in the city a disservice which will cause hardship and difficulty.
I mean, if we’re talking about the Green Administration, that was literally out of control. The fact that the bookkeeping wasn’t accurate, by tens of millions, was very damning.
That’s not true Benjamin. When Labour took control of the council in May 2023 they said they had been left with a £3 million “overspend” by the Greens. Yet Labour councillors voted for the budget a couple of months before, so they voted the budget through alongside the Greens and had access to all the same information at that point.
It’s also the same council officers now who do the “bookkeeping” you refer to as it was under the Greens. What councillors decide is how to spend the money they receive from central government (which Labour voted for alongside Greens). The day to day bookkeeping is done by officers. You can believe the political spin out there all you like, but it doesn’t add up that when Labour have a budget overspend it’s nothing to do with them, yet when anybody else does they are quick to point the finger.
It’s disingenous for Labour to refer to mid year overspends in the way they did when it’s other parties, and not apply the same to themselves. Greens and Labour were both lumbered with a poor hand because of the cuts to the Government’s funding they received.
They’re doing the same in national government. I don’t doubt it’s a tricky financial picture, but they refused to answer an FOI about how the “£22 billion black hole” they keep banging on about actually adds up. What are Labour trying to hide (other than lots of freebie Taylor Swift tickets!). It’s not a good look whatever it is. If they were just transparent about the true financial picture and they didn’t do this ugly blame game, I wouldn’t have issue with them. It’s the game playing that stinks.
£7m eh?
That’s roughly what VG3 is going to cost the local taxpayer!
So, wouldn’t it be a good idea to cancel it ? After all council consultants said it would have minimal benefit and lead to more congestion and pollution.
But BHCC Transport Dept and cllr Muten ( friend of Bricycles) know best !