High housing costs and a flatlining economy have left people in Brighton and Hove worse off – although every part of the country was sharing the financial pain, according to a think-tank report.
The Centre for Cities said that no part of Britain had escaped the effects of the “flatlining” of the economy since 2010.
The think-tank said that people had been left with £10,200 less to spend or save on average since 2010 than if the economy had grown in line with pre-2010 trends.
A comparison of disposable incomes in the UK’s 63 largest cities and towns showed that every place was “out of pocket”.
Gross disposable income growth per head was £13,590 lower in London than it would have been if it had grown in line with 1998-2010 trends.
Middlesbrough and Sunderland in the north east experienced similar average shortfalls of £13,200 and £12,730 per head respectively and people in Cardiff were £13,080 worse off on average, the report said.
The people of Burnley were especially out of pocket, where the average person was £28,090 worse off, as were people in Cambridge and Milton Keynes, where they would have been £21,000 richer on average if incomes had grown at pre-2010 trends, the study indicated.
The report added that housing costs have increased in most places, hitting disposable incomes, with the steepest rises in places in the greater south east such as Cambridge, London and Brighton, where people already faced high housing costs in 2010.
According to the research, rates of children in relative poverty have risen in almost every city and the proportion of children in relative poverty who live in working households has also risen.
Andrew Carter, chief executive of Centre for Cities, said: “Both the two main political parties have pledged to grow the economy and the general election debate will have growth at its heart.
“The challenge for the next government is to go beyond the rhetoric and to do what’s needed to make this rhetoric a reality.
“The UK has had a torrid time since the great recession. Everywhere, up and down the country, including places that were doing relatively well before, has been levelled down because of the lack of growth.
“To get growth in every place, the next government needs to act at a radically different pace and scale and mark the beginning of a multi-decade policy programme.
“The first step in a realistic approach to grow the economy is to recognise that the British economy is an urban economy.
“Cities account for 9 per cent of the land and over 60 per cent of the economy as well as 72 per cent of high-skilled jobs. Their slowdown is at the heart of why the national economy is struggling.
“There is no plausible way of achieving higher growth without increasing the innovation and dynamism of urban Britain.
“This means reforming the planning system to enable cities to grow, devolving more powers and financial freedoms to encourage our big cities to make decisions that support growth, and following the levelling up rhetoric with bold actions.”
Labour deputy leader and shadow levelling up secretary Angela Rayner said: “For all their promises to level up Britain, the Tories’ 14 years of failure have seen our country levelled down with people left worse off and crying out for change.
“Labour’s mission to return Britain to growth means moving away from the Tories’ failed sticking-plaster approach, boosting living standards and good jobs in every part of the country to drive productivity and opportunity.
“Labour is not afraid of making the bold calls needed to change our country, from reforming planning to get Britain building again to delivering a Take Back Control Act to give local leaders the tools to drive growth and contribute to national renewal.”
The government said: “We are committed to levelling up every corner of the UK, investing billions to support community regeneration projects, connecting 25.7 million premises with gigabit broadband, and over 50 per cent of England is now covered by a devolution deal.
“We have halved the number of people on low pay with increases in the national living wage, and thanks to an above-inflation increase to tax allowances, we have also saved the average earner over £1,000 a year since 2010.
“We did so after two massive global shocks – covid and Putin’s war of aggression against Ukraine – which affected every economy worldwide. And yet, the UK has grown faster than Germany, Italy, France, Spain and Japan.”
I would also look closer to home, traditionally no council of Brighton has encouraged industry here. More recently we have tried to discourage tourists with a combination of traffic frustration schemes, excessive parking fees and allowing the town to look shabby.
We need businesses and in order for that to happen we need businesspeople as councillors, not party members.
Except when we do they have a tendancy to award council contracts to their own bus company. No names.
Thank goodness Valley Gardens 3 will encourage thousands of new visitors and jobs into the city.
Not. Then we have the runaway success of the i360.
What a crying shame we have a city council with the Midas touch in reverse. They are talented at losing money but rubbish at making it, unless you count milking the motorist as a legitimate income generator.
The first major thing to encourage businesses is to remove the retail properties from the business rates scheme. The second would be to lower VAT for business under 1million turnover to 15%.
A city like Brighton and Hove has no industrial space whatsoever so an industrial park (with no supermarkets on) would no doubt be filled very quickly with business needed to expand.
Roads like Lewes road and London road should be earmarked for demolition and rebuilt with a minimum of 6 stories and good quality retail units. A lot that can be done.
The biggest one for this city is to get some form of rapid transport across the city. It shouldn’t take an hour to travel 4 mils on a bus.
I don’t know what Dave has against the people who live on the Lewes Road but he makes frequent posts suggesting that they be made homeless and now he’s adding London Road to his list of victims…
High housing costs. Think about that next times there’s an article on here about a proposed development with 10’s of retired, mortgage-paid-off, entitled misers complaining about people trying to have somewhere to live