A painting of King Charles III depicting him wearing a Jim’ll Fix It badge on show at a Brighton festival has drawn complaints.
The painting by Jake Fern, who has previously come under fire for a painting depicting graffiti reading Covid is a Scam, is being exhibited as part of the Artists Open Houses show in Albert Road this month.
Two art lovers say they were upset by the painting’s reference to the prolific paedophile Jimmy Savile, which they found in very bad taste.
When contacted by Brighton and Hove News, the artist stood by the depiction, saying we should take a closer look at the king because of his links to Savile.
The complainant, who wished to remain anonymous, said: “We were left feeling somewhat upset by a piece of art that depicts our recently coronated monarch in a degrading light.
“At first we were impressed by the likeness that the ‘artist’ had captured of King Charles III but on closer inspection we noticed that instead of his authentic regalia the king was portrayed wearing a ‘Jim’ll Fix It’ badge.
“We can only assume that the painter was making a swipe at the alleged relationship between King Charles and the late Jimmy Savile.
“Personally we found this in very bad taste.
“I would be grateful if you could warn others that they may find this exhibition upsetting.”
Mr Fern, from Saltdean, said: “Charles was extremely chummy with Savile just as Andrew was extremely chummy with Epstein. Two princes, two paedophiles. Strange coincidence?
“Worth noting that Chuck’s uncle Mountbatten was described in an FBI file as having ‘a perversion for young boys’, and beings as abuse tends to run in families maybe we should all look a little closer at the man with the expensive shiny hat on his head.”
The reference to the Duke of Mountbatten in FBI files was a remark made in 1944 by Baroness Decies about the duke, who was widely reported to be gay.
Mr Fern, 49, was one of a handful of people who were fined for holding illegal lockdown gatherings in Brighton and Hove, following a party in Providence Place on 13 November 2020.
He attempted to get the conviction overturned last October after being pursued for not paying the £374 in fines and costs he was ordered to pay by Brighton Magistrates Court in August 2021.
Court records state the application was refused because: “defendant refused to swear a statutory declaration and would only swear a declaration describing himself as ‘beneficiary of the trust fund named above’ i.e. describing himself as a trust fund.”
After the complaint about his Covid is a Scam artwork at a Rottingdean exhibition in October 2021, he made prints of the watercolour and sold them via his Instagram page, including tags such as #plandemic #newworldorder #depopulationagenda #eugenicsoperation #covidisapsyop.
A spokeswoman for Artists Open Houses said: “Artists Open Houses is an open platform festival where visitors are welcomed into over 170 homes and studios of artists across the city and beyond.
“Visitors will find artworks that they love and others not to their taste. The key is to visit the artists, see and discuss their works and for visitors make up their own minds.
“Opinions expressed by artists do not necessarily reflect the views of AOH.
“Artists are entitled to hold and present their own views, providing they are not in conflict with AOH terms and conditions i.e.: Listings or venues displaying images or language considered to be homophobic, racist, sexist, ageist, abusive to people with learning or other disabilities, will not be accepted and the right to register with AOH may be withdrawn.”
#NOTMYKING
“Alleged relationship”?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/06/prince-charles-repeatedly-sought-jimmy-savile-advice-documentary-claims
Love it, what a great painting.
Charles has well documented links to Jimmy Saville, as described in the letters they exchanged between 1986 to 2006, and witnessed in the multiple photo-ops the two enjoyed.
These sort of things do tend to run in the family after all…
So does the BBC, and by default anyone that watched his TV shows….
What utter rubbish! Are we responsible for the actions of our relatives? I am not pro-monarchy, but I am aware that, in his public work, Charles is having to meet, and be friendly with, many people, especially with regard to charities. And, as regards Savile, the. truth about his paedophile behaviour did not become public knowledge until after his death. It is unlikely that Charles, like the rest of us, were aware of it. That does not constitute an “alleged relationship”. Such criticism is reminiscent of the McCarthy trials in USA, when anyone who had any connection with leftist supporters was considered a communist, resulting in many of them unable to find work.
It is not a piece of art, but just childish propaganda behaviour from someone with a silly grudge against the monarchy.
I agree – smut and clickbait.. I remember when we had a press in this country.
Found the loyal bootlicker.
Why is it royalists are more upset when people highlight paedophilia in the royals then they are about royals being peadophiles?
Legend. Nothing wrong with shining a light on old ‘Dances with Nonces’